Socioplastics represents an architectonic transformation of transdisciplinary knowledge: a public, machine-readable field comprising six tomes, sixty books, six hundred chapters and 6,000 nodes, organised through three scales, nine triads, twenty-seven operators and eighty-one positions. Its foundational claim—that linguistic, material, institutional and technical forms jointly produce social reality—extends the relational insights of Foucault, Bourdieu and Latour while converting theory into operational infrastructure. Persistent identifiers, CamelTags, metadata, public indexes and century packs establish a scalar grammar through which nodes become chapters, chapters become books and books become tomes. The distinction between hardened nuclei and plastic peripheries exemplifies its Soft Ontology: stable concepts remain citable, while experimental edges permit revision. Yet this magnitude simultaneously produces Expansion Risk, since accumulation may weaken orientation, inflate terminology and convert a revisable field into a monument to its own coherence. Its most consequential operators identify mechanisms insufficiently differentiated elsewhere. SemanticHardening describes the moment when provisional language enters institutional or technical dependencies, making alteration structurally expensive; ArchiveFatigue names the divergence between expanding records and declining maintenance capacity; ThermalJustice renders climatic exposure politically legible; and CyborgText captures documents addressed simultaneously to readers, algorithms and administrative systems. The project’s current sixth tome, FieldEnvironment, marks a decisive scalar transition beyond the first 5,000-node cycle: the corpus no longer behaves merely as an archive but as an inhabited epistemic climate populated by concepts such as RawIndex, PublicSyntax, SelfMimesis and HomoEpistemologicus. This development intensifies the project’s central dilemma. A system capable of structuring future inquiry may also preselect what can be recognised, cited or contested. Its decisive case study is therefore Socioplastics itself: an architecture attempting to survive its author through distributed legibility, external reuse and revisable governance. Its success will depend not upon numerical completion but upon whether others can enter, challenge and transform its procedures.
Lloveras, A. (2026) ‘Socioplastics — Project Index’, Anto Lloveras / LAPIEZA-LAB.