A sentence can be grammatically correct while still failing to communicate anything, which suggests that grammar alone is not what makes language load-bearing; some relations within a sentence are doing real structural work — carrying the sentence's actual claim — while others are decorative, removable without collapsing the meaning. Load-bearing grammar asks which syntactic relations in an argument are structural in this sense and which are ornamental, a distinction most style guides never draw because they treat all correct grammar as equally necessary. ArgumentSeal reappears here from tectonic theory applied specifically to syntax: an argument's structural sentence, once identified and stress-tested, can be sealed as the claim the rest of the paragraph is actually built to support, while the remaining sentences can be edited freely without risking the argument's stability. Editing for clarity often means finding this one load-bearing sentence and protecting it, rather than treating every sentence as equally essential.
Forty, A. (2000) Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture. London: Thames & Hudson.
Alexander, C. (1979) The Timeless Way of Building. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brand, S. (1994) How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They're Built. New York: Viking.
Easterling, K. (2014) Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. London: Verso.
Evans, R. (1995) The Projective Cast: Architecture and Its Three Geometries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
